you are at »   TV  · Login
09,03,2010        Search
  Features


  August '08


  Sponsors


  TV

I'm Back

By Aaron 1/23/2008

Fox’s new show, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, got off to a great start two weekends ago with an episode on Sunday and Monday. It’s taken me a long time write this, because I have been really busy, and I wanted to do a good job. So. The two hour premier shows Sarah Connor (Lena Heady) and her son John (Thomas Dekker) about to settle down with Sarah’s new fiancé. But Sarah freaks out about the commitment she made and has John pack up ship and hit the road. Unfortunately Sarah’s fiancé can’t swallow that Sarah bailed on him and goes to the police, who call in an FBI officer (Richard T. Jones) hot on Sarah’s trail, now armed with the alias she was using. And just like Linda Hamilton’s Sarah Connor beat into John in the first three movies, once the name is in the grid, “they” can find you.

 

Continue reading here.


   

Game's End

By Aaron 11/28/2007

Two episodes worth of House: as the game begins to come to an end in episode 8, Kutner seizes onto a patient-magician who he is desperate to cure, and House lets him take the case, but if the magician is faking, House says Kutner will be fired. More interesting is House’s game that if the fellows bring him an object, they will receive immunity, and can send two candidates to the block. The object? The thong of Lisa Cuddy. After much scheming from Amber, Taub and Kutner, Cole turns in the red thong of Lisa Cuddy. Who will he send to the block? Meanwhile, House notices that Thirteen is off her game, and that her hand is shaking, and he assumes she is hiding a medical condition. Is it terminal? In the medical realm, House insists the patient is still faking, going so far as to offer himself as a test subject for the supposed bad blood given the patient. Is House right? What if he is wrong?


   

Welcome to Pantherama
 
By Aaron 11/19/2007

 

This episode is a cut above last weeks – doing everything right that last week’s did wrong: completing plot developments, humor, action, drama, the works. The traditional pep rally Pantherama is coming up and scouts are scouring the town trying to sign Panthers, and Smash in particular is receiving a lot of attention. With the pep rally quickly approaching Tammy passes off entertainment responsibilities to Tyra and Lyla. A bitter Julie writes a scathing article in the paper about Pantherama that divides the Taylor family, and for once Smash is Smash, Riggins is Riggins, Saracen is a new man and Street is absent.


   

Back in the Saddle Again
 
By Aaron 11/3/2007

This episode was great! Reaping the well-sewn seeds from the episode before. Lots of action, lots of stuff happens, and all the plotlines get a lot of attention – leading some of the small nuances of the show (like Saracen-Landry talks, Grandma Saracen vignettes or sexual tension between the caretaker and Saracen) are left out. But what does make it into the show is really good.

Continue reading here


   

Could “Avatar” Win Best Picture?

By Brett Hogan

 

Last week, the trailer for James Cameron’s sci-fi experiment “Avatar” debuted. While initially unimpressed with the teaser, I began to wonder: Could this film win best picture? 

 

Buzz has been generating for this movie for years. Years. The technology to make this movie didn’t exist when Cameron conceived it, so he invented it. When is the last time you heard of a director spearheading the invention of anything? The casting started in 2005. Most movies these days, even epics, are done in half that time. I could go on. 

 

The most important thing to take away from all of this is that people are saying this will be the future of movies. Now, I don’t agree with the idea that CGI will become more prevalent than it already is. But I do believe that this will set the bar miles higher for sci-fi. I mean, that is what Titanic did. And that won some awards if memory serves.

 

I’ll bet you’re asking yourself, how can you even suggest that a film like this will win Best Picture when the initial trailer was nothing better than visual stimulation? Well, there are a couple of reasons. First, the Academy has expanded Best Picture to ten films. This doesn’t guarantee anything other than improved chances for most films on the cusp.

 

Second, after last year’s Oscars debacle, which saw the best film of the year, “The Dark Knight,” not only get shafted in awards but nominations as well, the Academy is pulling out all the stops to appease those with the loudest voices in the film industry, the fanboys. Now, the Academy probably didn’t lose anything because of that other than some viewers of the award show. Perhaps if people are again outraged with the winners or nominees, the heads of the Academy would lose their jobs. So this is all about the Academy protecting itself, which is not so outrageous.  

 

 

Third, there is an economic motive here. I’ve heard this film will cost $190 million, not counting the R&D costs associated with Cameron’s inventions or the cost of getting 3-D cameras into every theater in the country. The Academy will do everything in its power to get people into the seats and make this the next “Titanic” or “The Dark Knight.” But the Academy doesn’t have much power, besides nominating and awarding, so they will slap the “Nominated for Best Picture” moniker onto every commercial and print ad to get the people who didn’t believe the critics to relent and see this movie.

 

Of course, all of this is pure conjecture, and no revolutionary film (Terminator 2, Jurassic Park, etc.) has ever won the Best Picture category because it changed the game. Except maybe Titanic. But still, could this movie actually win? My answer is no but a nomination is certain and who knows what could happen from there. We’ll know more come February 2010.